An entirely original and not at all second-rate (we're fifth-rate, tops) blog dedicated to making fun of bad sports journalism AND referencing Blackadder II in the obscurest way possible.
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Not everyone at The San Francisco Chronicle is Ray Ratto...
...but since they all write like him anyway, close enough. Scott Olster?
-- Dangerous flashback: Darren McFadden supposedly reminds Al Davis of Marcus Allen. Does that mean McFadden is doomed to be exiled mysteriously to the bench, with no explanation from the coach or from Davis?
Or, alternatively, that might mean the following:
As a professional, Allen ran for 12,243 yards and caught 587 passes for 5,411 yards during his career for both the Los Angeles Raiders and the Kansas City Chiefs from 1982 to 1997. He scored 145 touchdowns including a then league record 123 rushing touchdowns and was elected to six Pro Bowls when he retired. He was also a fairly good passer for a running back, completing 12 of 27 passes for 285 yards and 6 touchdowns, with only 1 interception. Allen was the first player ever to gain more than 10,000 rushing yards and 5,000 receiving yards during his career. (Thanks Wikipedia!)
But no, no, I'm sure that Al Davis is openly flaunting his own craziness by predicting the mysterious benching of McFadden in 2016. Actually, I guess we can't rule that out.
You know, this would be a golden opportunity to embed the Silver & Black Attack Video, but I already did that not too long ago. You're off the hook, readers...this time.
-- It's a strange comparison. Allen had nothing like McFadden's warp speed. Bo Jackson was the man with the golden wheels. All Allen had was moves, instinct, vision and a kind of man-up football toughness that most Raiders of the last five years wouldn't recognize if they bumped into it.
I myself have bumped into man-up football toughness a few times - what can I say, I'm clumsy? - and I have to admit I often don't recognize the guy. But I think that's mostly because he keeps changing his hair color. It's like he's a totally different person...with blue hair!
Anyway, what the hell is so confusing about Al Davis comparing his new franchise running back to the greatest running back in Raiders history (unless you want to go all Gale Sayers on me and argue Bo gets the nod on sheer potential)? Sure, Bo Jackson might be a better comparison technically speaking, but I don't think Al Davis was offering an appraisal of his skill set. He was, you know, trying to convince people the Raiders might stop sucking sometime in the near future due to their acquisition of a hopefully awesome running back.
-- I understand that NBA playoff basketball is a lot rougher than reg-season ball, with the refs letting a lot of physical stuff slide. What I don't understand is why. "Because fans don't want to see important playoff games decided by refs," you say. Good point. When I go to a regular-season game, I'm thinking, "Man, I hope the refs get busy tonight! Love those free throws!"
Again, what's with the cluelessness? This isn't honestly that complicated. Leaving aside the pretty massive question of whether NBA refs are incompetent or even corrupt, the rules are enforced more closely during the regular season because generally it's considered to be in the best interest of the game to enforce the rules as written. During the playoffs, this gets blurred because uncalled roughness is way less controversial than a ton of questionable foul calls (see Mr. Dwyane Wade, circa 2006). Basically, when a team's season is on the line, it's way better for any number of reasons for a close game to come down to the players than to the ref's decision-making.
All of which is really just a more complicated way of restating what Olster himself said I'd say: "Because fans don't want to see important playoff games decided by refs." In the regular season, with a few exceptions (that Cavs-76ers game springs to mind), it's way more acceptable to let refs make game-changing decisions during the regular season. You know, as long as the decision is the right one and is one they should be making.
I'm sorry, how the fuck is this complicated? I feel like I'm trying to explain why a triangle has three sides.
-- Nice finish, Mavericks! Bad trade, first-round ouster, Jerry Stackhouse thrown out of the final game for slapping the ball out of an opponent's hand during play stoppage, Josh Howard bizarrely admitting on a radio show that he's a pothead, coach getting fired, Mark Cuban exploding in a massive fireball. It's going to be a miserable offseason in Dallas. For everyone but Howard.
He's right, you know. Between the new Harold & Kumar entry and Pineapple Express, Josh Howard is in for one hell of an offseason at the movies.
You know...because he smokes weed! Which no one else in the NBA ever, ever does!
-- Barry Zito says, "I know it's fun to run with stories, 'Oh, is Zito done?' " All that glee in the press box over Zito's fall, I guess I missed it. Fun? No.
For the record, I'm not sure whether that particular Rookie of the Year clip was pre- or post-depowering. But it was the only one of him pitching on YouTube, and I felt my point remained valid. So if you have to point out my many dumbass errors...um, please point out a different one.
Also for the record, that wasn't a swipe at Dwyane Wade. That was a simple allusion to the undeniable controversy that erupted over the ref's calls during that series. Whether you think the controversy was justified or not (I honestly don't care that much either way), you can't really deny the controversy was a direct result of the refs making a ton of foul calls.
That's a slightly different animal than stars getting preferential treatment - indeed, that's a controversial non-call you embedded right there - although they're certainly both examples of refs adjusting their calls to the situation.
3 comments:
For the record, I'm not sure whether that particular Rookie of the Year clip was pre- or post-depowering. But it was the only one of him pitching on YouTube, and I felt my point remained valid. So if you have to point out my many dumbass errors...um, please point out a different one.
Also for the record, that wasn't a swipe at Dwyane Wade. That was a simple allusion to the undeniable controversy that erupted over the ref's calls during that series. Whether you think the controversy was justified or not (I honestly don't care that much either way), you can't really deny the controversy was a direct result of the refs making a ton of foul calls.
That's a slightly different animal than stars getting preferential treatment - indeed, that's a controversial non-call you embedded right there - although they're certainly both examples of refs adjusting their calls to the situation.
I also respectfully request you review my clarification and consider removing your editorial addition. Again, not a shot at Dwyane Wade.
Post a Comment